Imam Al Ghazali on the Method of Bringing Up Children

“Exposition of the Method of Bringing Up Children from Earliest Childhood, Teaching Them Good Behaviour and Refining Their Character.”

Excerpt from Imam al-Ghazali’s Revival of the Religious Sciences (Ihya `Ulum al-Deen)Translators note: Praise be to Allah, and peace upon His Beloved.

There is a conspicuous paucity of material available in English that provides sound Islamic guidance for Muslim parents on bringing up children. Recently, I noticed that Imam al-Haddad (Allah have mercy on him) mentioned some very useful but brief comments on the issue in his amazing, baraka-filled book, ‘Lives of Man’. He alluded therein to ‘The Revival of Religious Sciences’ by the Proof of Islam, al-Ghazali, and advised those desiring more detail to seek it there. Following this lead, I was pleased to find this invaluable chapter in the Ihya which is full of practical, down-to-earth advice for the Muslim parent, written with the usual authority of the great Imam (Allah have mercy on him). I found it so useful and insightful that I decided – insha Allah, with tawfeeq – to translate it for the benefit of my Muslim brothers and sisters, especially those who have children.

I hope that any who do find some benefit from it may make a brief mention of me and my family in their supplications.

In the name of Allah the Beneficent the Merciful

Know that the method of bringing up children is one of the most important and essential matters. The child is a trust in the hands of his parents, and his pure heart is an unblemished precious stone, free of any engraving or form. It is amenable to being engraved and moulded in any direction. If it is habituated and taught to be good, it will be raised upon this. Such a child will be felicitous in this world and the next, and his parents, teachers and educators will all share in his reward.

If the child is habituated to evil and neglected like an animal, he will be wretched and fall to destruction, and his sin will be shared by those responsible for his upbringing.

Allah the Exalted says, “O You who believe! Save yourselves and your families from a fire”. So, just as the father protects the child from the fire of this world, protecting him from the Fire of the next world is more appropriate. Saving him from the Hell-Fire is by teaching him good behaviour, manners and excellent character, and protecting him from bad company. The child should be prevented from becoming accustomed to ease and comfort, and should not be taught to love adornments and luxuries, lest he waste his life seeking after them when he grows up, and end up in eternal doom.

Rather, it is incumbent to supervise the child from his earliest infancy. Even when selecting a wet-nurse for the child, only a righteous, religious woman who eats only the halal is appropriate, as the milk produced from the illicit is devoid of blessing. The physical constitution of a child raised on such milk would be mingled with impurity, causing his nature also to deviate towards impurity. Continue reading

Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani

Profile

Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani was born in 1943 in Deoband, India. He is the son of the late Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi, the former Grand Mufti of Pakistan. He obtained his Takhassus degree (an advanced degree equivalent to Ph.D.) in Islamic education from Darul Uloom Karachi, the largest and most renowned Islamic educational institution in Pakistan. He also obtained a Master’s degree in Arabic literature from Punjab University, and a law degree (LLB) from Karachi University.

He is regarded as an expert in the fields of Hadith (sacred traditions of the Holy Prophet, may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him), Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), Economics, and Tasawwuf (Islamic spirituality). He has been teaching these and other branches of Islamic education since 1959.

He served as Judge of the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan from 1982 to May 2002. He is also a permanent member of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy, an organ of OIC based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He has served as the Vice Chairman of the Academy for nine years. He is also the Vice President of Darul Uloom Karachi.

He is generally known as one of the leading Shariah scholars active in the field of Islamic finance. For more than a decade he has served as chairman or member of Shariah supervisory boards of a dozen Islamic banks and financial institutions in various parts of the world. He presently serves as Chairman of the International Shariah Council for the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) in Bahrain.

He has held many positions in the higher echelons of the education sector of Pakistan and has participated in numerous commissions set up by the government of Pakistan in the field of education and economics. Since 1967, he’s been the Chief Editor of the monthly Urdu-language magazine “Albalagh”, and since 1990, he’s been Chief Editor of the monthly English-language magazine “Albalagh International.” He has also contributed articles to leading Pakistani newspapers on a range of issues. He has authored more than 60 books in Arabic, English, and Urdu. Continue reading

How Does An Average Person Recognise A Mujtahid

The essence of Taqleed is that a person who doesn’t have the capability to reach a decision based on the Qur’an and Sunnah should adhere to an expert scholar and rely upon his judgement. A question may arise from this explanation. That is, if the person following has no academic merit, how is he to determine the expertise of the scholar whom he is asking and following?” [Tahreeke Azadi Fikr: page 130] In response to this question, we will suffice with an excerpt from Imam Ghazali:

“If it is asked, a lay person may base his choice on assumptions and hence, he may be deceived by appearances. This may lead him to give preference to a lesser Imam over one who is more suited. So if he is allowed to exercise his judgement (in choosing an Imam) and acts upon his assumptions, why can’t he then act upon his assumptions in the issue under discussion? Understanding the various degrees of scholarship is very intricate and a lay person cannot be the best judge for that. This question is valid. Our answer is that if a non-physician, whose child has become sick, decides to administer medicine as he sees fit will be held responsible and will be guilty of transgression. If he consults a physician, he will not be responsible and will not be transgressing. If there are two physicians in town and they differ over the prescription, then if the father of the son decides to take the prescription of the lesser over that of the better physician, he will be held accountable. He (the father) would know of the better physician by merely listening to the opinions formed by patients, by the lesser physician’s referral to the better physician and by overwhelming signs which will convince him (the father) that this physician is better than the other. The same is the case for choosing the best scholar from several. There is no need to look into the issue itself (just as it is not necessary to look into the prescription or medicine). This much, the lay person is quite capable of doing and determining. It is not proper to go against the overwhelming assumption merely because of likes and dislikes. This is the most correct opinion – in our view – and the most suitable for regulating people in God-consciousness (Taqwa) and accountability.” [Al-Mustasfa, by Al-Ghazali: vol. 2, page 126]

Is Taqleed a defect?

Taqleed was prevalent during the time of the Companions of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam Companions who were not able to practice Ijtihad themselves referred to those who were scholars. It has been argued by some quarters that Taqleed presumes a lack of knowledge (or ignorance) which is contrary to the belief of the Ahle Sunnah, that all Companions should be revered. Associating the Companions with Taqleed is tantamount to declaring them as defective and hence unworthy of following. All the Companions of the Prophet sallalahu alaihi wa sallam had knowledge and they were all jurists in their own right. [Tahreeke Azadi Fikr, by Maulana Salfi: page 133-135] This criticism is merely emotional. Not being a jurist nor a Mujtahid is not a blemish on one’s personality. Conversely, being a jurist and or a Mujtahid does not guarantee merit in the Eyes of Allah. Allah says: “Certainly, the most noble amongst you – with Allah – is he who is the most God-conscious (the one who has the most Taqwa).” not the most knowledgeable. A person possessing all the elements of Taqwa, but devoid of any academic merit is not considered flawed for that reason. All acknowledge that the Companions were of the very highest Taqwa – which is the ultimate distinction in Islam. They were as a community the best community after the Prophets But to assume that all the Companions were jurists is totally against the Qur’an:

“So if a contingent from every expedition remained behind (and not participate in Jihad), so that they could devote themselves to understanding religion they could admonish their people on their return so that they (those returning) may guard themselves against evil.” (Surah Al-Taubah : 123) Continue reading

Responses To Doubts Raised Against Taqleed

 

The Following of Forefathers is Condemned in the Qur’an

The Qur’an has categorically condemned the following of ancestors and forefathers: “And when it is said to them: “Follow that which Allah has revealed”, they reply: “No, rather we will follow what we have found our fathers upon.” (This they say) Even though their fathers do not understand, nor are they guided.” (Surah Al-Baqarah : 170)

This verse outlines of the basic understanding of the religion. The polytheists did not accept the principle values of Tauheed (the Oneness of Allah): Prophethood and the concept of the Hereafter, and used the argument that their forefathers did not believe in these values. The concept of Taqleed does not entail following Imams or Mujtahids in such fundamental issues and truths as beliefs because these are not subject to Ijtihad. That is why this is made categorically clear in all classical literature. For example. Shaykh Amir Badshah Bukhari wrote in his commentary on Tahreerul Usool:

“The chapter on the areas where asking for a Fatwa is valid are issues and rules which are non-conclusive and which are not related to beliefs. This is because certitude is required for issues relating to aqeeda [beliefs] according to the sound opinion. Taqleed will be disallowed in such issues and it is necessary to acquire such truths through correct understanding.”[Taiseerul Tahreer, by Amir Badshah Al Hanafi : vol. 4, page 243]

The Taqleed, which is condemned in the above-cited verse, has also been categorically denied by the Imams. Shaykh Khatib Al Baghdadi has used the very same to prove this point in his book Usool Aqaid [Al-Faqih wal Mutafaqqih by Khatib vol. 2, page 66]. Allah has given two reasons why the Taqleed of forefathers is condemned. Rejecting the revealed words and commandments of God and announcing to follow their fathers regardless of the truth of the message. The second is that their forefathers were bereft of understanding and guidance. The Taqleed under discussion does not fall into these two forms of misguidance. None who expounds the doctrine of Taqleed shuns Allah and His Messenger and then follows an Imam in their place. In fact, they deem their Imam to be an interpreter of the Quran and Sunnah. Continue reading

Muhammad Abu Zahra

Shaykh Muhammad Abu Zahra (1898–1974) was a conservative Egyptian public intellectual, traditional scholar of Islamic law, and author.

Muhammad Abu Zahra was educated at the Ahmadi Madrasa, the Madrasa al-Qada al-Shari and the Dar al-Ulum. He taught at al-Azhar’s faculty of theology and later, as Professor of Islamic law at Cairo University. He also served as a member of al-Azhar’s Academy of Islamic Research. His more than forty books include biographies of Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik, Shafi’i, Ibn Hanbal, Zayd ibn Ali, Imam Jafar as-Sadiq, Imam Zain al Abideen, Ibn Hazm, and Ibn Taymiyyah, as well as works on personal status, pious endowments (waqf), property, and crime and punishment in Islamic law. [ John Esposito, The Oxford Dictionary of Islam, Oxford University Press 2003]

Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Mustafa Abu Zahrah was born on March 29, 1898, corresponding to 1316 AH, in Al-Mahllah Al-Kubra, a provincial capital in Lower Egypt. His was a distinguished family, but he was to achieve distinction in his own right.

In his early years, Muhammad Abu Zahrah joined a pre-school nursery that taught the Qur’an, then he pursued his education in an elementary school run by Al-Azhar, the famous Islamic university founded over 1,000 years ago. After studying in a secondary school, he joined in 1913 the institute attached to the Ahmadi mosque in Tanta, where his native intelligence and genuine interest in Islamic studies enabled him to shine. He won wide respect among his colleagues and teachers. Hence, it came as no surprise when, in 1916, he was top of the entry examination to the institute of Islamic judges. Most of the applicants were several years older than him and had studied in different schools for much longer.

After graduation, he joined the teaching staff first in the faculty of Usool Al-Deen, in Al-Azhar, then in the law faculty. The first one is specialized in Islamic thought, while the second is a normal department of law at university level. Needless to say, Abu Zahrah’s specialization in that department was Islamic law. His teaching career saw him rise to the post of head of the Islamic Law Department and professor of Shariah in the university. In 1958, when he was 60 years of age, he retired from teaching, but he was yet to join the Islamic Research Academy in Al-Azhar. That was in 1962.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah gives us an insight into his personality and career. He mentions that his early schooling was aimed at memorizing the Qur’an, which he did when he was still an adolescent. But even at that time, two traits were easily distinguishable and were to remain with him throughout his academic life. The first was attaching a great value to his independent thinking, which made others call him a “stubborn child”, and the second was his strong dislike of authoritarian rule at all levels. These traits reflected themselves in adult life in personal courage in standing up for what he believed to be the truth, against powerful opposition.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah was a prolific author, writing no less than 34 books on a wide variety of issues. His first book was a biography of the Prophet and the events that took place during his lifetime. This is a long history in three volumes. He also wrote a book on the Qur’an highlighting the distinctive features of its unique style which presents a challenge to all creatures to compose even a small portion like it. In this book he provides an in-depth study of various approaches of the Qur’an, particularly in relating the same story several times, but each time it shows the story in a different light so as to sound absolutely new.

His most famous books, however, were a series of eight books of a minimum of 350 pages each. He devoted each book to the study of the life, views and scholarship of one of the leading scholars in Islamic history. These scholars were: Abu Haneefah, Malik, Al-Shafie, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Zaid ibn Ali, Jaafar Al-Sadiq, Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Hazm. These works reflect his deep love of all these scholars and the great respect he afforded to each one of them. Together, his books provide an insight into the depth of Islamic scholarship and the different methodologies used by these great scholars. The personal biography he provides of each of these scholars is very detailed, enabling us to paint a true picture of the man and the main trends that influenced his scholarship. He then discusses the methodology each one of them follows and outlines the main views that distinguish each one.

His other works were mainly in the field of Islamic law covering a wide range of topics. Thus, we have a book on inheritance and a shorter one on inheritance according to the Jaafariyah school of law, which is a Shia school. He devotes a whole book to discuss the concept of crime in Islamic law and another to punishment. His legal works also cover personal and family law, the marriage contract, endowment, ownership and the Islamic concept of contracts.

Abu Zahrah also wrote extensively on comparative religion, devoting a whole book to Christianity, and another to other faiths. Another book he wrote in this field is a text book on the methodological principles of Islamic Fiqh. But he also wrote on social questions, such as the Islamic social structure and the nature of Islamic society. A third book in this area is the one devoted to social security in the Muslim community.

Going through the list of his books is sufficient to give us a clear idea of the breadth of his scholarship and the high degree of excellence of his knowledge. May God shower mercy on his soul. [Source]